log in personal page contact us EGL

Youth work practice needs to be guided by a youth work policy that…

Previous bullet point Next bullet point

is developed on the basis of relevant and updated knowledge on young people’s needs, rights and interests as well as on new research and the different forms and methods of youth work that can be used in order to meet aims and objectives.

Back to chapter

Introduction

In order to be knowledge based, policy development must start from a clear and commonly understood picture of the current state of play. In order to achieve this, there must be clear and well established procedures for analysing and taking into account the follow up and evaluation of local preconditions, work processes and outcomes.

Starting from this analysis and in order to be able to take relevant steps, all stakeholders must also be well informed about, discuss and take into account

– the living situation and needs of all different groups of young people concerned;

– the different forms and methods of youth work that can be used in order to meet aims and objectives;

– research and new trends in the field of youth and youth work on European, national and local level.

Without this knowledge policy risks to be formed by purely personal opinions and, no longer valid, presumptions.

References

Guiding questions

To what degree does our local youth work meet this bullet point?

Are there sides/aspects of it that are not reached?
Are there differences related to different activities?
Are there differences related to different groups of young people?
Are there differences related to different youth work providers?
Are there other differences? Related to what?

Specific questions
  • How do we keep ourselves up-dated on young people’s needs and interests?
  • How do we keep ourselves up-dated on research and new forms and methods of youth work?
    • How do we secure that the sources for information that we use are relevant and trustworthy?
  • Are we deciding on policy as if youth work looks the same today as it did 30 years ago?
    • How has, as an example, the growth of digital youth work affected our youth work policy?

Self-assessment

You have to be logged in to make the self-assessment.

Good practices & tools

  • Regional government and cities together for youth

Learn more 

  • Ruuti participation framework for young people of Helsinki

Learn more 

Future steps

What different steps do we need to take in order to meet this bullet point?

Do we miss any knowledge that we need?
Do we need to take contact with stakeholders not present in our discussions?
Do we need to develop new competences, methods, work processes or organisational structures?
Can we find good practices or tools that might help us to improve this?
Do we have positive experiences from other areas of youth work that we can use also in this case?
Are there other organisations that we can contact and learn from regarding this?
Do we need to take other measures?
Do we have to revise our perspectives and/or priorities regarding youth work?

You have to be logged in to enter future steps.